生态安全格局视角下三江源国家公园地质灾害危险性
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

贾天朝(1998-),男,博士研究生,主要从事民族地区生态经济与资源开发研究。E-mail:jtc2517528185@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P694.1;X321

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(42271221,42061037);宁夏自然科学基金项目(2023AAC03099)


Risk Assessment of Geological Hazards of the Three-River-Source National Park from the Perspective of Ecological Security Pattern
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]定量评估三江源国家公园地质灾害危险性空间分布状况,探究其对生态安全格局的影响,为区域减灾防灾和国土空间规划调整提供对策。[方法]基于GIS与信息量模型,从地质灾害孕育和诱发角度选取12个评价因子,对三江源国家公园地质灾害危险性进行评价,并结合生态安全格局构建廊道与优化分区进行分析。[结果]1)三江源国家公园地质灾害高危险、极高危险区面积为25 614.32 km2,占20.81%。2)三江源国家公园地质灾害发生的主控孕灾和诱发因子分别是坡度(信息量值为6.238 52)和距农村居民点距离(13.270 66),人类活动与地质灾害间存在较高的敏感性。3)识别生态源地面积为26 833 km2,提取生态廊道55条(6 080.15 km),识别核心保护区(39 613.58 km2)、生态保育区(67 261.84 km2)、游憩展示区(10 143.44 km2)、传统利用区(6 081.34 km2)等功能区域。4)三江源国家公园生态安全格局受地质灾害影响较大,主要影响的区域为长江源园区(65.30%)、澜沧江源园区(77.90%)的核心保护区和黄河源园区(88.97%)的传统利用区,黄河源园区是廊道风险性最高的园区。[结论]三江源国家公园地质灾害对生态安全格局的影响空间差异明显,应当分区分类采取相应防治措施。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] This study aimed to quantitatively assess the spatial distribution of geologic hazards in the Three-River-Source National Park, explore their impact on the ecological security pattern, and provide countermeasures for regional disaster mitigation and prevention and land-use planning adjustment. [Methods] Based on GIS and the information value model, 12 assessment factors were selected from the perspective of disaster preparation and induction of geological disasters to assess the geological disaster risk of the Three-River-Source National Park, and analyze it in combination with the construction of ecological corridors and optimization of ecological security pattern. [Results] 1) The area of high-risk and extremely high-risk geological hazards of the Three-River-Source National Park is 25 614.32 km2, accounting for 20.81% of the total area. 2) The main controlling disaster-forming and disaster-inducing factors of geological disasters of the Three-River-Source National Park are slope(information value=6.238 52) and distance from rural residential areas(information value=13.270 66). There is a high correlation between geological disaster sensitivity and human activities. 3) The identified area of ecological sources is 26 833 km2, with 55 ecological corridors extracted(6 080.15 km2). Functional zones include core protected areas(39 613.58 km2), ecological conservation areas(67 261.84 km2), recreation and display areas(10 143.44 km2), and traditional utilization areas(6 081.34 km2), etc. 4) The ecological security pattern of the Three-River-Source National Park is greatly affected by geological disasters. The main affected areas are the core protected areas of the Yangtze River Source Park(65.30%), the Lancang River Source Park(77.90%), and the traditional utilization area of the Yellow River Source Park(88.97%). The Yellow River Source Park is the park with the highest risk in the corridor. [Conclusion] There are obvious spatial differences in the impact of geological hazards on the ecological security pattern in the Three-RiverSource National Park, and corresponding preventive and control measures should be taken in a zoned and categorized manner.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

贾天朝, 文琦, 施琳娜, 吴昕燕, 丁金梅.生态安全格局视角下三江源国家公园地质灾害危险性[J].水土保持学报,2025,39(4):109~117

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-24
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-07
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-09-10
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭