六盘山华北落叶松林坡面土壤储水时空变化特征及其影响因素
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

刘姗(2001-),女,硕士研究生,主要从事森林生态水文研究。E-mail:liushan0611@126.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S152.7

基金项目:

“十四五”国家重点研发计划项目(2022YFF1300404);国家自然科学基金项目(42477090);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项(CAFYBB2020QB004)


Spatiotemporal Variation Characteristics of Soil Water Storage and Their Influencing Factors on a Larix gmelinii var. rincipis-rupprechtii Plantation Hillslope in Liupan Mountains
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的] 受气象条件、植被特征、土壤性质和地形因子等差异影响,坡面土壤水分沿坡面分布的差异导致土壤储水量有明显空间变异,但目前对森林坡面不同坡位土壤水分动态及其影响因素的解析还不系统。[方法] 以六盘山半湿润区华北落叶松林典型坡面为研究对象,于2023年5至10月监测了坡上、坡中和坡下3个坡位0~80 cm土层土壤水分体积分数变化,并同步观测气象条件、植被结构和土壤水文物理性质等。[结果] 1)土壤储水量存在坡位差异,其平均值表现为坡中>坡下>坡上,但土壤储水量的波动在坡中最大。2)在时间上,各坡位单场降雨事件0~80 cm土层土壤储水量增量变化均属强变异,0~10、10~20 cm土层土壤储水量增量的变异较小;影响土壤储水量增量时间变化的主要因素为降雨量和降雨时长;各坡位单个无雨时段0~80 cm土层土壤储水量减少量变化均属强变异,其中10~20 cm土层变异最小;影响土壤储水量减少量时间变化的主要因素为潜在蒸散量和无雨天时长。3)不同坡位间土壤储水量增量大小表现为坡中>坡下>坡上,主要与土壤体积质量和饱和导水率有关;土壤储水量减少量大小表现为坡中>坡上>坡下,主要与林地蒸散、石砾体积分数和总孔隙度有关。[结论] 研究结果对于深入理解坡面水分再分配机制及科学指导半湿润区山地的林水管理有重要价值。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] Variations in meteorological conditions,vegetation characteristics,soil properties,and topographic features lead to differences in soil moisture distribution along hillslopes,which in turn cause significant spatial variability in soil water storage(SWS). However,the current understanding of soil moisture dynamics and their influencing factors at different slope positions on forested hillslopes remains insufficiently systematic. [Methods] A study was conducted on a typical larch forest hillslope in the semi-humid Liupan Mountains. From May to October 2023,the spatiotemporal variations in soil volumetric water content were monitored at three slope positions(upper,middle,and lower)within the 0―80 cm soil layer. During the same period,meteorological conditions,vegetation structure,and soil physical properties were observed simultaneously. [Results] 1)Soil water storage(SWS)varied significantly across different slope positions,with the average values following the order:middle slope>lower slope>upper slope. However,the greatest fluctuations in SWS were recorded on the middle slope. 2)Temporally,the incremental changes in SWS within the 0―80 cm soil layer exhibited strong variability across all three slope positions during a single rainfall event. Among different layers,the SWS in the 0―10 cm and 10―20 cm soil layers demonstrated relatively lower variability. The primary factors influencing the temporal variation of SWS increments were rainfall amount and duration. The variation in SWS reduction in the 0―80 cm soil layer was also highly variable at all three slope positions during a single rain-free period,with the least variability observed in the 10―20 cm soil layers. The main factors affecting the temporal variation of SWS reduction were potential evapotranspiration and the duration of rain-free periods. 3)Spatially,SWS increment magnitude followed the order of middle slope>lower slope>upper slope,mainly related to soil bulk density and saturated hydraulic conductivity. The magnitude of SWS reduction followed the order of middle slope>upper slope>lower slope,mainly related to stand evapotranspiration,gravel volumetric content,and total porosity. [Conclusion] These findings provide valuable insights into the mechanisms of soil water redistribution on forested hillslopes and offer scientific guidance for sustainable forest-water management in semi-humid mountainous regions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘姗, 刘泽彬, 王梦飞, 王彦辉, 徐丽宏, 刘小粉, 于澎涛.六盘山华北落叶松林坡面土壤储水时空变化特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2025,39(5):234~243

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-02
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-03
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-10-20
  • 出版日期: 2025-10-28
文章二维码