微生物菌剂对华北地区小麦土壤养分及细菌群落结构的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

河北农业大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:


Effects of Microbial Agents on Soil Nutrients and Bacterial Community Structure in Wheat Fields of North China
Author:
Affiliation:

Hebei Agricultural University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究小麦-玉米轮作系统小麦季拔节期施用不同菌剂类型对土壤性状的影响。于2022-2024年布设田间试验,共设清水对照(CK)、施用生长素微生物菌剂(T1)、施用微生物菌剂(T2)、施用生防微生物菌剂(T3)4个处理,研究不同菌剂对土壤化学性状、细菌群落结构及小麦产量的影响。研究表明:两个试验年份,0-20 cm土层,施用各菌剂较CK可显著改善土壤化学性状,T2处理提升土壤碱解氮和有效磷含量效果最为显著,分别提高22.60%-29.61%和21.63%-37.51%,同时pH值显著降低,速效钾含量各处理无显著差异。20-40 cm土层,T2处理有效磷含量较CK显著提升22.05%,各处理pH值、有机质、碱解氮、速效钾含量无显著差异。与CK相比,施用各菌剂均有利于提高根际土壤细菌α多样性指数,显著提高2.98%-4.04%。施入菌剂后对土壤细菌优势菌门相对丰度有显著影响,在施入90天后,与CK相比,T1、T2、T3处理变形菌门的相对丰度分别显著提升2.70%、5.42%、3.71%,T2处理芽单胞菌门的相对丰度显著降低4.75%。各施用菌剂处理根际土壤中具有生防、促生功能的细菌相对丰度高于CK处理,而具有诱病作用的致病菌类诺卡氏属(Nocardioides),在15天和90天相对丰度均显著降低。与CK相比,施用菌剂处理小麦产量2022-2023和2023-2024年分别显著提高8.28%-20.43%和5.70%-16.23%,其中T2处理效果最显著。综上所述,小麦拔节期施用菌剂在活化土壤养分,提升细菌多样性、生防/促生功能菌丰度及小麦产量方面具有较好效果,其中施用胶冻样类芽孢杆菌PM12效果最佳。

    Abstract:

    To investigate the effects of different types of microbial agents applied during the jointing stage of wheat in a wheat-maize rotation system on soil properties, a field experiment was conducted from 2022 to 2024. Four treatments were set up: a water control (CK), application of auxin-producing microbial agent (T1), application of microbial agent (T2), and application of biocontrol microbial agent (T3). The impacts of these agents on soil chemical properties, bacterial community structure, and wheat yield were examined. The results showed that in the 0-20 cm soil layer, the application of various microbial agents significantly improved soil chemical properties compared to CK. The T2 treatment had the most significant effect on increasing soil alkaline nitrogen and available phosphorus content, with increases of 22.60%-29.61% and 21.63%-37.51%, respectively, and a significant decrease in pH value, while there was no significant difference in available potassium content among all treatments. In the 20-40 cm soil layer, the available phosphorus content in the T2 treatment was significantly higher than that in CK by 22.05%, and there were no significant differences in pH value, organic matter, alkaline nitrogen, and available potassium content among all treatments. Compared to CK, the application of all microbial agents was conducive to increasing the α-diversity index of rhizosphere soil bacteria, with an increase of 2.59%-3.29%. The application of microbial agents significantly affected the relative abundance of dominant bacterial phyla in the soil. Ninety days after application, compared to CK, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in the T1, T2, and T3 treatments increased significantly by 2.70%, 5.42%, and 3.71%, respectively, while the relative abundance of Gemmatimonadetes in the T2 treatment decreased significantly by 4.75%. The relative abundance of bacteria with biocontrol and growth-promoting functions in the rhizosphere soil of all microbial agent treatments was higher than that in the CK treatment, while the relative abundance of the pathogenic Nocardioides, which has disease-inducing effects, was significantly reduced at both 15 and 90 days. Compared to CK, the wheat yield in the microbial agent treatments increased significantly by 8.28%-20.43% in 2022-2023 and by 5.70%-16.23% in 2023-2024, with the T2 treatment showing the most significant effect. In conclusion, the application of microbial agents during the jointing stage of wheat effectively activated soil nutrients, enhanced bacterial diversity and the abundance of biocontrol/promotive function bacteria, and increased wheat yield, with the application of Pseudomonas fluorescens PM12 being the most effective.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-19
  • 最后修改日期:2025-03-13
  • 录用日期:2025-03-21
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-07
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码