苏打盐碱退化湿地淹水恢复对土壤有机碳储量的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国科学院东北地理与农业生态研究所;2.东北林业大学;3.Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目)


Effect of flooding restoration on soil organic carbon storage in soda saline-alkali degraded wetland
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences;2.Northeast Forestry University;3.130102

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    [目的]为科学评价内陆退化盐碱湿地恢复后的生态环境效应,分析恢复后土壤有机碳含量及储量的变化规律。[方法]选择松嫩平原西部盐碱区域典型沼泽湿地退化多年地块(碱斑地、羊草地)和经淹水恢复的芦苇沼泽地为研究样地,基于样地植被地上-地下生物量、地下1 m土壤剖面理化性质、养分含量等指标的测定,分析探讨退化盐碱湿地恢复过程中SOC含量及储量的变化规律及影响因子。[结果]恢复后芦苇湿地植被生物量和植被碳库分别为8446.54 g·m-2、1.90 kg·m-2,较羊草地分别增加了422.68%、216.67%,碱斑地植被生物量和植被碳库为0,羊草地植被生物量和植被碳库分别为1616.00 g·m-2、0.60 kg·m-2,退化湿地淹水恢复促进了植被生物量和碳储量的增加;恢复后芦苇沼泽湿地地下1 m土壤剖面有机碳储量为17.38 kg·m-2,较碱斑地、羊草地分别增加了64.12%、4.45%,碱斑地为10.59 kg·m-2,羊草地为16.64 kg·m-2,退化湿地淹水恢复促进了土壤有机碳储量的增加;退化与恢复后的湿地深层土壤有机碳含量均高于表层,植被生长提高了土壤有机碳含量,土壤颗粒之间的空隙和淹水促进了有机碳向深层迁移;SOC含量及储量与土壤含水率呈显著正相关(p<0.05),与总氮、总磷、电导率、氮磷比呈显著负相关(p<0.05),且碱斑地、羊草地、芦苇湿地土壤理化性质彼此之间均存在显著差异(p<0.05),退化湿地恢复过程中SOC含量受土壤环境条件的影响,土壤环境的改善,有利于SOC的积累。[结论]研究成果表明对苏打盐碱退化湿地进行淹水恢复有利于“双碳”目标的实现。

    Abstract:

    [Objective] In order to scientifically evaluate the eco-environmental effects of inland degraded saline-alkali wetlands after restoration, and to analyze the changes of soil organic carbon content and reserves after restoration. [Methods] Selected typical marsh wetlands degraded for many years (alkali spot land, Leymus chinensis grassland) and flooded phragmites australis swamp land in the western part of Songnen Plain as study sample plots. Based on the measurement of aboveground-underground biomass, physical and chemical properties and nutrient content of 1 m underground soil profile, the changing rules and influencing factors of SOC content and storage in degraded saline-alkali wetland were analyzed and discussed. [Results] after restoration, the vegetation biomass and carbon pool of phragmites australis wetland were 8446.54 g·m-2 and 1.90 kg·m-2 respectively, which increased by 422.68% and 216.67% respectively compared with Leymus chinensis grassland. The vegetation biomass and carbon pool of alkaline spot land were 0, and those of Leymus chinensis grassland were 1616.00 g·m-2 and 0.60 kg·m-2, respectively. Flooded restoration of degraded wetlands promoted the increase of vegetation biomass and carbon storage. After restoration, the organic carbon storage in 1 m soil profile of phragmites australis marsh wetland was 17.38 kg·m-2, which was 64.12% and 4.45% higher than that in alkali spot land and Leymus chinensis grassland, 10.59 kg·m-2 in alkali spot land and 16.64 kg·m-2 in Leymus chinensis grassland. Flooded restoration of degraded wetlands promoted the increase of soil organic carbon storage. The content of soil organic carbon in the deep soil of the degarded and restored wetlands was higher than that in the surface layer, the growth of vegetation increased the content of soil organic carbon, and the gaps and flooding between soil particles promoted the migration of organic carbon to the deep layer. The content and storage of SOC were positively correlated with soil water content, and negatively correlated with total nitrogen, total phosphorus, electrical conductivity and the ratio of nitrogen to phosphorus. There were significant differences in soil physical and chemical properties among alkali spot, Leymus chinensis grassland and phragmites australis wetland. The content of SOC was affected by soil environmental conditions and the improvement of soil environment in the restoration process of degraded wetland. It is beneficial to the accumulation of SOC. [Conclusion] The flooding restoration of soda saline-alkali degraded wetlands is conducive to the realization of the goal of "double carbon".

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-13
  • 最后修改日期:2025-02-25
  • 录用日期:2025-03-11
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-07
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码