桑干河流域淤地坝沉积泥沙特征及其来源解析
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

中国科学院、水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(42277338);第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究(2019QZKK0307);四川省科技计划项目(2022YFS0500)


Sediment Characteristics and Sources Tracing of Yudiba Dam in Sang-kan River Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为查明桑干河流域的泥沙主要策源地和侵蚀产沙变化,选取阳原县高墙乡典型淤地坝沉积泥沙为研究对象,利用复合指纹识别技术,测定沉积泥沙及其源地的土壤粒径、SOC、TN、137Cs、低频质量磁化率等9种指纹因子,研究了不同淤积阶段的泥沙策源地及坝控小流域侵蚀产沙演变规律。结果表明:(1)沉积泥沙中137Cs平均含量较低,与沟壁土壤无显著差异(p>0.05),但极显著小于林草地和耕地的137Cs含量(p<0.01),这指示淤地坝沉积泥沙主要来源于沟壁;(2)由于沟壁中大部分137Cs含量低于检出限,137Cs较好地指示了泥沙主要来源沟谷地中的沟壁,但难以用于小流域多种策源地的判别,经Kruskal-Wallis H非参数检验和多元逐步判别分析筛选,确定TN+Xlfb+SOC构成最佳指纹因子组合,有效地判别了小流域2006—2017年泥沙源地的平均贡献率,结果显示沟壁(82.68±8.20%)>耕地(15.36±8.46%)>林草地(1.96±0.33%);(3)在小流域侵蚀产沙过程中,沟壁长期是主要的泥沙贡献区,林草地对侵蚀性降雨的响应较弱,耕地在极端暴雨发生时其泥沙贡献率显著上升。这表明137Cs核素示踪技术有效地适用于该区小流域主要泥沙策源地判别,复合指纹技术则可以更好地厘定多元泥沙策源地。沟蚀引起的沟壁崩塌是桑干河流域土壤侵蚀严重的主要原因。

    Abstract:

    Large amounts of sediment due to severe soil erosion in Sang-kan River Basin have a significant impact on the ecological environment of the basin and the water quality of Kwanting Reservoir. The study of sediment sources apportionment is of great importance to the formulation of soil and water conservation measures and the development of ecological environment construction. Aiming to explore the main source of sediment and the evolution of erosion and sediment yield in Sang-kan River Basin, the composite fingerprinting identification technology was used in this study. A typical yudiba dam was selected in Gaoqiang Township, Yangyuan County, Zhangjiakou City, North China. Three types of potential sediment sources were identified, which were gully wall, croplands, and forest-grasslands. Nine types of soil physical and chemical properties were measured, including soil particle size, SOC, TN, radionuclide (137Cs) and low-frequency magnetic susceptibility (Xlfa, Xlfb and Xlfc correspond to particle sizes of 2 mm, 0.063 mm and 0.05 mm respectively). The results show that the 137Cs average content of sediment was not significantly different from that of gully wall soil, and very significantly lower than that of forest-grasslands and croplands soil (p<0.01), which indicated that the sediment was mainly from gully wall. The whole siltation process was divided into three stages: stage Ⅰ (2007—2010), stage Ⅱ (2011—2013) and stage Ⅲ (2014—2017), based on changes in SOC and TN concentrations in the deposition profiles. As the majority of 137Cs content of gully wall was below the detection limit, 137Cs was a good indicator for identifying gully wall as the main sediment source but it was difficult to be used for multiple sediment sources in the small basin. The Kruskal-Wallis H nonparametric test was used to screen out 7 fingerprint factors with significant difference (p<0.05) among the different sediment sources, and the multiple stepwise discriminant function analysis was performed under the premise of Wilks'' lambda minimization. The optimum combination of fingerprint factors was composed of TN, Xlfb and SOC, and the cumulative correct discriminant rate of gully wall, croplands and forest-grasslands reached 86.1%. During the study period, the average contribution rates of sediment sources in the small basin were ranked in the descending order of gully wall (82.68±8.20%) > croplands (15.36±8.46%) > forest-grasslands (1.96±0.33%), and the goodness of fit ranged from 83.58% to 90.43%. The sediment contribution ratios per unit area of sediment sources were ranked in the descending order of gully wall (5.52) > croplands (1.55) > forest-grasslands (0.03), in stage Ⅲ. In the evolution of erosion and sediment yield, gully wall has long been the primary sediment source; croplands were the secondary sediment source, and its sediment contribution rate increased significantly when extreme rainstorm occurred, which was sensitive to extreme rainstorm; the sediment contribution rates of forest-grasslands were stable at low levels, and much lower than the area proportion of forest-grasslands in the small basin. Overall, the 137Cs tracing technique is suitable for identifying the main sediment source in the small basin, and the composite fingerprinting technique is better at identifying multiple sediment sources. The erosive rainfall was the main factor of soil erosion in Sang-kan River Basin, and the gully wall collapse caused by gully erosion was the main reason of serious soil erosion in the basin.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-17
  • 最后修改日期:2023-08-17
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-05
  • 出版日期: