工程堆积体上不同植被类型枯落物和土壤水文效应
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

丁鹏玮(1997-),男,硕士,主要从事水土保持与生态恢复重建研究。E-mail:2858020224@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S714

基金项目:

贵州省高层次创新型人才项目(黔科合平台人才[2018]5641);中国博士后科学基金项目(2020M673296);贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合平台人才[2017]5788);贵州省一流学科建设项目(GNYL[2017]007)


Hydrological Effects of Litter and Soil of Different Vegetation Types on Engineering Accumulation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探讨工程堆积体不同植被类型的枯落物特征、枯落物持水及拦蓄能力、土壤物理性状和土壤涵水性能,采用室内浸水法和环刀法分别对工程堆积体植被与原生植被的枯落物及0—20 cm土层的持水能力进行研究。结果表明:(1)不同植被类型枯落物厚度及蓄积量均存在显著差异(P<0.05),原生乔木林、乔木林、灌木林、草地枯落物厚度依次为3.76,2.89,2.67,1.23 cm,蓄积量分别为5.95,3.86,3.19,0.65 t/hm2。枯落物未分解层厚度、蓄积量均大于半分解层。(2)各植被类型土壤容重与毛管孔隙度范围分别在1.19~1.25 g/cm3和41.58%~46.13%,原生乔木林土壤容重小于乔木林,而土壤毛管孔隙度大于乔木林。堆积体各植被类型土壤毛管孔隙度大小依次为草地>灌木林>乔木林。(3)各植被类型土壤最大持水量及毛管持水量均存在显著差异(P<0.05),土壤最大持水量与毛管持水量范围分别为44.31~46.23,34.07~37.98 g/cm3,均呈现原生乔木林最高,乔木林最低。(4)枯落物持水量随时间呈对数关系,吸水速率随时间呈幂函数关系,其吸水速率在0.5 h最高,在4.0 h下降,12 h最大持水量达饱和,吸水速率接近于0。(5)原生乔木林枯落物最大持水率、有效拦蓄率均大于乔木林,工程堆积体各植被类型最大持水率及有效拦蓄率表现为草地>灌木林>乔木林。从堆积体枯落物和土壤持水能力角度来看,草灌混交这一搭配模式可以作为工程堆积体的先锋植被,用于在堆积体初期构建稳定群落生态结构。研究结果可为工程堆积体开展水土保持治理措施和植被恢复提供理论依据。

    Abstract:

    In order to explore the litter characteristics of different vegetation types in the engineering accumulation, the water holding capacity and retention capacity of the engineering accumulation vegetation, litter of the native vegetation and 0—20 cm soil layer were studied by indoor immersion method and cutting ring method respectively. The results showed that: (1) There were significant differences in litter’sthickness and volume among different vegetation types (P<0.05). The litter’sthickness of primary arbor forests, arbor forests, shrub forests, and grassland were 3.76, 2.89, 2.67, 1.23 cm, and the litter’s volume amount were 5.95, 3.86, 3.19, 0.65 t/hm2. The thickness and volume of the undecomposed layer were larger than that of semi-decomposed layer. (2) The soil bulk density and capillary porosity of different vegetation types ranged from 1.19 g/cm3 to 1.25 g/cm3 and 41.58% to 46.13% respectively. The soil bulk density of the primary arbor forests was lower than that of arbor forests, while the soil capillary porosity was higher than that of arbor forests. The order of soil capillary porosity of different vegetation types in the accumulation body was grassland, shrubs forests, and arbor forests. (3) The maximum soil water holding capacity and capillary water holding capacity of different vegetation types were significant different (P<0.05). The maximum soil water holding capacity and capillary water holding capacity ranged from 44.31 to 46.23 and 34.07 to 37.98 g/cm3, and the primary arbor forest was the highest and the arbor forest was the lowest. (4) The water holding capacity of litter showed logarithmic relationship with time. The water absorption rate was the highest at 0.5 h, and decreased at 4.0 h. The maximum water holding capacity reached saturation at 12 h, and the water absorption rate was close to 0. (5) The maximum water holding rate and effective interception rate of the primary arbor forests litter were higher than those of the arbor forests. The maximum water holding rate and effective interception rate of each vegetation type of the engineering accumulation body were grassland>shrub forests>arbor forests. From the perspective of litter and soil water holding capacity, the combination made of grass and shrub can be used as a pioneer vegetation for the construction of stable community ecological structure at the initial stage of the accumulation. The research results can provide a theoretical basis for the soil and water conservation measures and vegetation restoration.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

丁鹏玮, 戴全厚, 姚一文, 高儒学.工程堆积体上不同植被类型枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):135~142,151

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-21
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-07-20
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码