首页 > 过刊浏览>2020年第34卷第2期 >173-180. DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.02.025
PDF HTML阅读 XML下载 导出引用 引用提醒
玉米地土壤微生物量碳、氮及微生物熵对不同物料还田的响应
CSTR:
[cstr]
作者:
作者简介:

周元(1996-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤肥力提升与保护研究。E-mail:zhouyuan960216@163.com

中图分类号:

Q143;Q938;S154.36

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFD0300300）；国家玉米产业技术体系项目（CARS-02-04）


Responses of Soil Microbial Biomass Carbon, Nitrogen and Microbial Entropy to Different Materials Returned to Corn Fields
Author:
  • 摘要
    • | |
  • 访问统计
    • |
  • 参考文献 [33]
    • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
    • |
  • 引证文献
    • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    在四川丘陵区紫色土上进行田间试验，以无物料还田为对照，对比分析了蚕豆秸秆、油菜秸秆、猪粪3种物料还田对夏玉米吐丝期和收获期0—20，20—40 cm土层土壤有机碳、全氮、微生物量碳氮含量及微生物熵的影响，以期为农业废弃有机物料的综合利用及四川丘陵区土壤质量的提升提供理论参考。结果表明：（1）尽管有机物料还田于0—20 cm土层中，0—20，20—40 cm土层土壤有机碳（SOC）、全氮（TN）、微生物量碳（SMBC）、微生物量氮（SMBN）含量均受到有机物料的深刻影响。各处理0—20 cm土层SOC、TN、SMBC、SMBN含量均显著高于20—40 cm土层，且上下2层土壤SOC、TN、SMBC和SMBN含量在生育时期间均表现为吐丝期>收获期。（2）在2个生育时期，3种物料还田均能提高0—20，20—40 cm土层SOC、TN、SMBC、SMBN含量。与对照相比，物料还田处理的SOC、TN、SMBC、SMBN含量分别提高2.6%~141.2%，1.9%~33.0%，5.1%~114.7%，41.5%~98.7%，其中收获期各处理0—20，20—40 cm土层SOC、SMBC、SMBN均表现为油菜秸秆 > 蚕豆秸秆 > 猪粪 > 对照，TN表现为蚕豆秸秆 > 猪粪 > 油菜秸秆 > 对照。（3）各处理SMBC/SMBN、qMB、SMBN/TN分别为3.74~10.53，0.86%~2.19%，1.01%~3.41%，且物料还田降低SMBC/SMBN，提高土壤qMB和SMBN/TN值。相关分析表明，SMBC、SMBN与SOC、TN之间均存在极显著正相关关系。因此，农业生产中可通过物料还田提供给微生物足够的碳氮营养，提高土壤SMBC、SMBN、SOC、TN含量和qMB值，维持较高的农田生产力，提升土壤质量，但具体施用物料时还需寻求土壤肥力提升、玉米产量增加以及环境效益之间的平衡。

    Abstract:

    In order to study the effects of different materials returned to field on soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and microbial entropy of 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm soil layers in summer maize silking and harvesting period, a field experiment was conducted on the purple soil in Sichuan Hilly area. This study was expected to provide a theoretical reference for the comprehensive utilization of agricultural waste organic materials and the improvement of soil quality in hilly areas of Sichuan. Four treatments with different materials returned to field were designed in this experiment, including control (no material returned to the field), faba bean straw, rape straw and pig manure. The results showed that:(1) Although the organic materials were returned to the 0-20 cm soil layer, the soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), microbial biomass carbon (SMBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) contents in both 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm layers were significantly affected. The contents of SOC, TN, SMBC and SMBN in the 0-20 cm soil layer were significantly higher than those in 20-40 cm. Soil SOC, TN, SMBC and SMBN in both soil layers appeared as silking stage>harvest stage during the growth period. (2) In the two growth periods, the three materials returned to the field could increase the SOC, TN, SMBC and SMBN contents of 0-20 cm and 20-40 cm soil layers. Compared with the control, the contents of SOC, TN, SMBC and SMBN in the treatments with materials returned were increased by 2.6%~141.2%, 1.9%~33.0%, 5.1%~114.7% and 41.5%~98.7%, respectively. The contents of SOC, SMBC and SMBN in both soil layers appeared as rape straw > faba bean straw > pig manure > control, while TN contents as faba bean straw > pig manure > rape straw > control. (3) In this study, SMBC/SMBN, qMB and SMBN/TN varied from 3.74 to 10.53, 0.86% to 2.19% and 1.01% to 3.41%, respectively. The materials returned to the field reduced SMBC/SMBN and improved soil qMB and SMBN/TN values. Correlation analysis indicated that there were significantly positive relationships between SMBC, SMBN, SOC and TN. Therefore, we could improve the contents of SMBC, SMBN, SOC, TN and qMB value by returning materials to the field in agricultural production, and then we could maintain high farmland productivity so as to improve soil quality. However, during returning the specific types of materials, the balance among higher soil fertility, maize production and environmental benefits should also be considered.

    参考文献
    [1] 赵士诚,魏美艳,仇少君,等.氮肥管理对秸秆还田下土壤氮素供应和冬小麦生长的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2017(2):20-25.
    [2] 董林林,王海侯,陆长婴,等.秸秆还田量和类型对土壤氮及氮组分构成的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(4):1143-1150.
    [3] Cheng Y, Zhang J B, Müller C, et al.15N tracing study to understand the N supply associated with organic amendments in a vineyard soil[J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2015,51(8):983-993.
    [4] Georgieva S, Christensen S, Petersen H, et al. Early decomposer assemblages of soil organisms in litterbags with vetch and rye roots[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2005,37(6):1145-1155.
    [5] 孙瑞莲,朱鲁生,赵秉强,等.长期施肥对土壤微生物的影响极其在养分调控中的作用[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(10):1907-1910.
    [6] 张成霞,南志标.土壤微生物生物量的研究进展[J].草业科学,2010,27(6):50-57.
    [7] 路怡青,朱安宁,张佳宝,等.免耕和秸秆还田对潮土酶活性及微生物量碳氮的影响[J].土壤,2013,45(5):894-898.
    [8] 唐海明,李超,肖小平,等.有机肥氮投入比例对双季稻田根际土壤微生物生物量碳、氮和微生物熵的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(4):1335-1343.
    [9] Gong H R, Jing L, Ma J H, et al. Effects of tillage practices and microbial agent applications on dry matter accumulation, yield and the soil microbial index of winter wheat in North China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2018,184:235-242.
    [10] 马想,黄晶,赵惠丽,等.秸秆与氮肥不同配比对红壤微生物量碳氮的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2018,24(6):1574-1580.
    [11] 张鹏鹏,濮晓珍,张旺锋.干旱区绿洲农田不同种植模式和秸秆管理下土壤质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(3):839-849.
    [12] Wei T, Zhang P, Wang K, et al. Effects of wheat straw incorporation on the availability of soil nutrients and enzyme activities in semiarid areas[J].PloS One,2015,10(4):e0120994.
    [13] 张娟霞,刘伟刚,宁媛,等.长期秸秆还田与施氮后土壤活性碳、氮的变化[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):212-217.
    [14] 吕盛,王子芳,高明,等.秸秆不同还田方式对紫色土微生物量碳、氮、磷及可溶性有机质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(5):266-272.
    [15] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:25-110.
    [16] 吴金水,林启美,黄巧云,等.土壤微生物生物量的测定方法及其应用[M].北京:气象出版社,2006:45-56.
    [17] Lovell R D, Jarvis S C, Bardgett R D. Soil microbial biomass and activity in long-term grassland:Effects of management changes[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1995,27(7):969-975.
    [18] 李江涛,钟晓兰,刘勤,等.长期施用畜禽粪便对土壤生物化学质量指标的影响[J].土壤,2010,42(4):526-535.
    [19] Zhang P, Chen X L, Wei T, et al. Effects of straw incorporation on the soil nutrient contents, enzyme activities and crop yield in a semiarid region of China[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2016,160:65-72.
    [20] 唐海明,程凯凯,肖小平,等.不同冬季覆盖作物对双季稻田土壤有机碳的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(2):465-473.
    [21] Blair N F, Aulkner R D, Till A R, et al. Long-term management impacts on soil C,N and physical fertility:Part I:Broadbalk experiment[J].Soil and Tillage Research,2006,91(1/2):30-38.
    [22] Li C X, Ma S C, Shao Y, et al. Effects of long-term organic fertilization on soil microbiologic characteristics, yield and sustainable production of winter wheat[J].Journal of Integrative Agriculture,2018,17(1):210-219.
    [23] 张春霞,郝明德,魏孝荣,等.不同农田生态系统土壤微生物生物量碳的变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2006,14(1):81-83.
    [24] 徐阳春,沈其荣,冉炜.长期免耕与施用有机肥对土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷的影响[J].土壤学报,2002,39(1):83-90.
    [25] 李世清,李生秀.有机物料在维持土壤微生物体氮库中的作用[J].生态学报,2001,21(1):136-142.
    [26] Azeez J O, Averbeke W V. Nitrogen mineralization potential of three animal manures applied on a sandy clay loam soil[J].Bioresource Technology,2010,101(14):5645-5651.
    [27] 龙攀,隋鹏,高旺盛,等.不同有机物料还田对农田土壤有机碳以及微生物量碳的影响[J].中国农业大学学报,2015,20(3):153-160.
    [28] 倪进治,徐建民,谢正苗,等.不同有机肥料对土壤生物活性有机质组分的动态影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2001,7(4):374-378.
    [29] Wardle D A. Controls of temporal variability of the soil microbial biomass:A global-scale synthesis[J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1998,30(13):1627-1637.
    [30] 王利利,董民,张璐,等.不同碳氮比有机肥对有机农业土壤微生物生物量的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2013,21(9):1073-1077.
    [31] Sparling G P. Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matte[J].Soil Research,1992,30(2):195-207.
    [32] Azamf Y M, Hussain F. Determination of biomass N in some agricultural soils of Punjab, Pakistan[J].Plant and Soil,1989,113(2):223-228.
    [33] 王传杰,肖婧,蔡岸冬,等.不同气候与施肥条件下农田土壤微生物生物量特征与容量分析[J].中国农业科学,2017,50(6):1067-1075.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

周元, 陈远学, 蒋帆, 胡月秋, 龙玲, 裴丽珍, 李建兵, 徐开未.玉米地土壤微生物量碳、氮及微生物熵对不同物料还田的响应[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(2):173~180

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2029
  • 下载次数: 1310
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-04-13
文章二维码
通讯地址：陕西省杨凌区西农路26号《水土保持学报》编辑部 邮政编码：712100 电话：029-87012707   029-87092114
网址：http://stbcxb.alljournal.com.cn E-mail：stbcxb@nwsuaf.edu.cn
技术支持：北京勤云科技发展有限公司
网站版权©水土保持学报 备案号：辽ICP备11015528号-2