重庆市典型工程堆积体边坡物理力学变化及稳定性特征
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157.1

基金项目:

重庆市水利局科技项目“生产建设项目弃土弃渣水土流失规律研究”;重庆市生产建设项目“水土流失危害研究”


Physical and Mechanical Changes and Stability Characteristics of the Typical Engineering Accumulation Slope in Chongqing
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    :以重庆市城镇建设活动形成的典型工程堆积体为研究对象,对工程堆积体边坡物理力学特性和入渗特征进行了研究,同时确定工程堆积体边坡的危险滑动面及安全系数。在工程堆积体边坡上、中、下设置采样点,采集土壤样品进行土壤物理力学性质分析,采用野外双环入渗法进行入渗过程研究,运用GEO-SLOPE软件分析工程堆积体边坡稳定性。结果表明:(1)工程堆积体粒度分布不均匀,且<2 mm粒径的含量随着堆放时间的增加而增大;各工程堆积体分形维数在2.04~2.47之间变化,且表现为上坡位>中坡位>下坡位。(2)工程堆积体饱和含水量随坡位下降呈逐渐增加趋势;入渗率随时间变化呈快速减小、缓慢减小、稳定入渗3个阶段,2 m、2 a和4 a堆积体稳定入渗率分别为4.53,3.17,7.02 mm/min。(3)不同堆放时间的工程堆积体剪切力和剪切位移的关系呈硬化型曲线;粘聚力和内摩擦角分别在16.43~31.88 kpa和2.23°~41.69°之间;不同堆放时间的工程堆积体安全系数均大于1.5,其稳定性大小依次为2 a>2 m>4 a,最危险滑动面的安全系数分别为1.77,2.23,1.66。比较而言,堆放2 a的工程堆积体稳定性最好,堆放2 m的次之,堆放4 a的堆积体稳定性最差。

    Abstract:

    This article mainly targets on the investigated engineering spoils were typical of those placed during urban construction activities in Chongqing. Studied on physical and mechanical properties and infiltration characteristics of engineering accumulation body slope and determined the dangerous slip surface and safety factor of the slope of the engineering accumulation. The sampling points were arranged in the slope, the middle and the bottom and soil physical and mechanical properties were analyzed by collecting soil samples of the engineering accumulation, the infiltration process was studied by using the field double ring infiltration method, and the stability of the slope was analyzed by GEO-SLOPE software. The results showed as follows:(1)The grain size distribution of the engineering accumulation was not uniform, and the content of <2 mm particle size increased with the stacking time. The fractal dimension of each engineering accumulation varied from 2.04 to 2.47, and it showed up-slope>middle-slope>down-slope. (2) The saturated-water content of the engineering accumulation body gradually increases with the descending of the slope position; Infiltration rate with time showed three stages (rapid reduction, slow reduction, stable infiltration). The stable infiltration rates of the 2-month engineering accumulation (2 m), 2-year engineering accumulation (2 a) and 4-year engineering accumulation (4 a) were 4.53 mm/min, 3.17 mm/min and 7.02 mm/min, respectively. (3) The relationship between the shearing force and the shear displacement of the engineering accumulation in different stacking time is hardened; the cohesion values and internal frictional angles of all of the engineering accumulation were 16.43kPa ~31.88kPa and 2.23°~41.69°. The safety factors of the critical slip surfaces of the slopes underlain by the various engineering spoils were greater than 1.5, and the stability order is 2 years >2 months >4 years, the safety factor of the most dangerous sliding surface were 1.77, 2.23 and 1.66. By comparison, stacking 2 years of engineering accumulation body stability is the best, stacked in February of the second, stacked 4 years of accumulation of the worst stability.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

丁文斌, 李叶鑫, 史东梅, 蒋光毅.重庆市典型工程堆积体边坡物理力学变化及稳定性特征[J].水土保持学报,2017,(1):109~115

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-03-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
关闭