泥石流流域失稳性坡面土壤抗蚀性评价
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

俞陈辉(1997—),男,在读硕士研究生,主要从事土壤侵蚀与生态恢复方面的研究。E-mail:ychenhui@fafu.edu.cn

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S157.1

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(42071132);中国科学院山地灾害与地表过程重点实验室开放基金项目(2019);福建农林大学杰出青年科研人才计划项目(xjq2017016)


Evaluation of Soil Anti-Erodibility of Unstable Slope in Debris Flow Basin
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为探究失稳性坡面不同区段对土壤抗蚀性的影响效应,加深滑坡对坡面土壤结构作用机制的认识,以云南省昆明市东川区蒋家沟流域为研究区,选取区内3个气候区(温带湿润山岭区、亚热带和暖温带半湿润区、亚热带干热河谷区)共5个样地(大地阴坡、小尖风阳坡、多照沟阳坡、查菁沟阳坡、大凹子沟阴坡),分析土壤样品的理化性质,并运用主成分分析法对5个样地失稳性坡面土壤抗蚀性进行综合研究。结果表明:(1)5个样地的土壤持水量、孔隙结构、有机质含量、水解氮含量、速效钾含量、土壤团聚体粒径≥0.25 mm占比、土壤团聚体平均重量直径在稳定区显著大于堆积区,呈现稳定区>失稳区>堆积区趋势;而土壤容重、有效磷含量、全磷含量、土壤团聚体粒径<0.25 mm占比则在稳定区显著小于堆积区。(2)5个样地的土壤抗蚀性综合得分(F)均表现出稳定区(2.401)>失稳区(0.017)>堆积区的规律(-2.417),且3个坡面区段间差异显著(p<0.05)。3个坡面区段土壤抗冲指数大小依次为稳定区(45.873 L/(s·g))>失稳区(33.245 L/(s·g))>堆积区(15.723 L/(s·g)),稳定区与堆积区差异显著(p<0.05)。抗冲指数与抗蚀性具有极显著正相关关系。(3)土壤持水性、孔隙度、有机质含量、氮钾含量、粒径≥0.25 mm团聚体含量和团聚体平均重量直径与土壤抗蚀性综合得分呈显著正相关;而土壤容重、有效磷含量、粒径<0.25 mm的微团聚体含量则与土壤抗蚀性综合得分呈显著负相关。研究结果阐明了泥石流流域土壤抗蚀性对失稳性坡面的响应机制,促进了灾害对土壤结构影响效应的认识,为总结提升失稳性坡面土壤抗蚀性的综合措施提供参考依据。

    Abstract:

    This paper aims to investigate the effect of different sections of unstable slope on soil anti-erodibility and deepen the understanding of the action mechanism of landslide on slope soil structure. Totally five sample plots (including Dadi shady slope, Xiaojianfeng sunny slope, Duozhao gully sunny slope, Chajing gully sunny slope and Daaozi gully shady slope) in three climate regions (including temperate humid mountain ridge region, subtropical and warm temperate sub-humid region, subtropical dry-hot valley region) were selected as a research area in the Jiangjia gully watershed, Dongchuan district, Kunming, Yunnan Province. We analyzed the physical and chemical properties of soil samples and used principal component analysis (PCA) to study the soil erosion resistance of unstable slopes in the study plots. The results showed that:(1) The soil water-holding capacity, porosity structure, organicmatter content, hydrolyzed nitrogen, available potassium, the proportion of particle size ≥ 0.25 mm, mean weight diameter of soil aggregate in the stable area were significantly larger than those in the accumulation area. The above indicators showed the trend of stable area> unstable area>accumulation area, while the soil bulk density, available phosphorus, total phosphorus, and the proportion of particle size<0.25 mm in the stable area were significantly smaller than those in the accumulation area. (2) The comprehensive index of soil anti-erodibility (F) of the 5 sample plots ranged as:stable area (2.401)>unstable area (0.017)>accumulation area (-2.417), and the difference among 3 slope sections was significant (p<0.05). The indexes of soil anti-scourability followed the rule as stable area (45.873 L/(s·g))>unstable area (33.245 L/(s·g))>accumulation area (15.723 L/(s·g)). There were significant differences between the stable zone and theaccumulation zone (p<0.05). There was a significantly positive relationship between the comprehensive index of soil anti-erodibility and the indexes of soil anti-scourability. (3) The soil water-holding capacity, porosity, organic matter content, nitrogen and potassium content, the proportion of particle size ≥ 0.25 mm and mean weight diameter in the study area were significantly positively correlated with the comprehensive scores of soil anti-erodibility, while the soil bulk density, available phosphorus content, and particle size <0.25mm were significantly negatively correlated with the comprehensive scores of soil anti-erodibility. This study clarifies the corresponding mechanism of soil erosion resistance in debris flow basin on landslide induced unstable slope, promotes the understanding of the impact of disasters on soil structure, and has reference value for comprehensive measures to improve soil erosion resistance on unstable slope.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

俞陈辉, 田雪, 刘鑫铭, 虞西尔, 林勇明.泥石流流域失稳性坡面土壤抗蚀性评价[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(4):13~21,29

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-29
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-07-22
  • 出版日期: 2022-08-28