三峡山地不同坡位土壤的水分特征曲线及水力学性质
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

李文政(1997-),男,硕士研究生,主要从事土壤水文研究。E-mail:lwzheng97@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

S152.7

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(41771261,41601215);湖北省自然科学基金重点项目(2015CFA141)


Soil Water Retention Curve and Hydraulic Properties at Different Slope Positions in the Three Gorges Mountainous Area
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    山地不同坡位的土壤水力学性质研究可为地表水文过程预测和坡地生态修复提供参考。通过采集三峡库区大老岭林区山地不同坡位的原状土样,测定饱和导水率、当量孔径、水分库容等水力学参数,利用V-G模型拟合土壤水分特征曲线,评价不同坡位土壤的渗透性能和持水能力。结果表明:坡顶土壤的入渗性能最好,平均饱和导水率为108.54 cm/d,其他坡位平均饱和导水率为34.81~47.56 cm/d。坡顶土壤的持水能力最差,吸力值从0增至100 kPa,含水量下降幅度最大(63.67%),其他坡位下降幅度在46.36%~52.07%。坡顶土壤大孔隙体积比最大可达20.95%,其他坡位在12.27%~16.58%。田间持水量库容占总库容的百分比以坡顶土壤最小(45.24%),其余在60.08%~65.33%。用V-G模型拟合土壤水分特征曲线,各样点决定系数R2均大于0.95,拟合效果较好。饱和导水率与大孔隙体积比、砂粒含量呈正相关,与粉粒含量和黏粒含量呈负相关。V-G模型参数α与进气值相关,α值越小,持水能力越强。试验中α值与砂粒含量、大孔隙体积比呈正相关,与粉粒含量和黏粒含量呈负相关。砂粒和大孔隙越多,土壤持水性越差。参数n的取值影响拟合水分特征曲线的弯曲程度,n值越小,曲线越平缓。试验中n值与砂粒含量呈正相关,与粉粒含量呈负相关。砂粒含量越多,随吸力增大土壤排水越快。可见,山地坡面顶部土壤的持水能力最差,渗透能力最强,其他坡位差异不显著,V-G模型拟合的结果与实测结果一致。

    Abstract:

    Research on soil hydraulic properties in different positions of the hillslope can provide reference for the prediction of surface hydrological process and ecological restoration in mountainous areas. In this study, undisturbed soil samples were collected from different slope positions in Dalaoling forest region, which was a typical small catchment of the Three Gorges Reservoir area, and the hydraulic parameters such as saturated water conductivity, equivalent pore diameter and water storage capacity were measured. The V-G model was used to fit the soil water characteristic curve to evaluate the soil permeability and water holding capacity of soil at different slope positions. The results showed that the soil infiltration performance of the top position was the best, and the average saturated hydraulic conductivity was 108.54 cm/d, while the average saturated hydraulic conductivity of other four slope positions was 34.81~47.56 cm/d. However, the water content of the top position decreased largely (63.67%) when the suction value increased from 0 to 100 kPa, while the average water content of other four positions decreased by 46.36%~52.07%. The macropore volume ratio of the soil at the top position was 20.95%, and that of the other four points was ranging from 12.27%~16.58%. The percentage of field water capacity in total soil water storage capacity was 45.24% in the top position, which was the smallest, and that of the other four points was 60.08%~65.33%. The V-G model was used to fit the soil water retention curve, and the determination coefficient (R2) of each point was greater than 0.95, which indicated that the fitting effect was good. The saturated hydraulic conductivity was positively correlated with soil macropore volume ratio and sand content, and negatively correlated with silt content and clay content. The parameter α of V-G model was related to air entry values. The smaller α value was, the stronger the water retention capacity was. In the experiment, α value was positively correlated with sand content and macropore volume ratio, and negatively correlated with silt content and clay content. The more sand particles and macropores was, the worse soil water holding capacity was. The value of parameter n affected the curvature of fitting water characteristic curve. The smaller n value was, the smoother the curve was. And n value was positively correlated with sand content and negatively correlated with silt content. The more sand content was, the faster the soil drainage was with the increasing of suction. The soil at the top of the mountain slope had the worst water-holding capacity and the strongest permeability, while the difference of other slope positions was not significant. The results of V-G model fitting were consistent with the measured results.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李文政, 刘目兴, 易军, 张海林, 卢世国, 白雨诗.三峡山地不同坡位土壤的水分特征曲线及水力学性质[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(3):135~142

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-14
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-05-29
  • 出版日期: