御道口牧场不同类型防护林的枯落物水文效应
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

郝弯弯(1992-),女,河南洛阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事森林可持续经营研究。E-mail:623325910@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目"坝上高原及华北北部山地沙化土地治理与沙产业技术研发及示范"(2016YFC0500802);基于CFERN基础上的不同人工针叶林生物量和碳储量研究(LY201515)


Hydrologic Effects of Different Forest Types Shelterbelt Litter in Yudaokou Ranch
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以承德市围场县御道口牧场4种不同类型(落叶松、樟子松、落叶松和樟子松混交林、樟子松和榆树混交林)防护林为研究对象,采用样地调查和室内浸泡法,对其枯落物的水文效应进行研究。结果表明:各种类型防护林的枯落物蓄积量的范围为5.42~24.59 t/hm2,其中落叶松蓄积量最大,为24.59 t/hm2,樟子松和榆树混交林蓄积量最小,为5.42 t/hm2,且4种林分类型的半分解层蓄积量均大于未分解层;平均最大持水量规律为落叶松(16.61 t/hm2) > 樟子松和落叶松混交林(14.80 t/hm2) > 樟子松(10.22 t/hm2) > 樟子松和榆树混交林(9.99 t/hm2);平均最大持水率大小依次为落叶松(427.02%) > 樟子松和榆树混交林(396.30%) > 樟子松和落叶松混交林(360.88%) > 樟子松(303.13%);有效拦蓄量规律为樟子松和落叶松混交林(74.65 t/hm2) > 落叶松(71.21 t/hm2) > 樟子松(48.82 t/hm2) > 樟子松和榆树混交林(17.66 t/hm2);有效拦蓄率规律为落叶松(344.99%) > 樟子松和榆树混交林(326.66%) > 樟子松和落叶松混交林(286.27%) > 樟子松(215.49%)。综合结果表明落叶松的枯落物层持水能力最好,该地区落叶松防护林的枯落物层涵养水源功能优于其他类型的林分。

    Abstract:

    In this paper, four different forest stands (larch pine forest, camphor pine forest, mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine, and mixed forest of camphor pine and elm) of yudaokou pasture in weichang County, Chengde city were chosen as objects and their hydrologic effect of litter was studied by sample survey and indoor soaking method. The results showed that the amount of litter in various forest stands was 5.42~24.59 t/hm2, of which larch pine forest had the largest amount, 24.59 t/hm2, and the amount of mixed forests of camphor pine and elm was the smallest, 5.42 t/hm2. The contents of the semi-partition layer of the four stands of forest were all larger than the undecomposed layer. The average maximum water holding capacity was larch pine forest (16.61 t/hm2) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (14.80 t/hm2) > camphor pine forest (10.22 t/hm2) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (9.99 t/hm2). The average maximum water holding rate was larch pine forest (427.02%) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (396.30%) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (360.88%) > camphor pine forest (303.13%). The effective retaining content was mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (74.65 t/hm2) > larch pine forest (71.21 t/hm2) > camphor pine forest (48.82 t/hm2) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (17.66 t/hm2). The effective retaining rate was larch pine forest (344.99%) > mixed forest of camphor pine and elm (326.66%) > mixed forest of larch pine and camphor pine (286.27%) > camphor pine forest (215.49%). The comprehensive results showed that larch pine forest has the best water holding capacity in litter layer, and the function of retaining water in litter layer of larch shelter forest in this area is better than other types of forest stand.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

郝弯弯, 赵鹏, 李思维, 谷建才.御道口牧场不同类型防护林的枯落物水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(6):197~204

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-31
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-12-19
  • 出版日期: