不同耕作和灌溉方式对玉米光合特性的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

刘战东(1981-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事作物生理与水分高效利用研究。E-mail:lzddragon@163.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

Q945.11;S513

基金项目:

公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503117);国家自然科学基金项目(51309226);国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-02-14)


Effects of Different Tillage and Irrigation Methods on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Maize
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以旋耕畦灌(CK)为对照,探究不同耕作和灌溉方式处理夏深松畦灌(XS35)、秋深松畦灌(QS35)、秋深松微喷灌(QS35SI)和秋深松滴灌(QS35DI)对玉米光合特性的影响,以确定深松耕下的合理灌溉方式。结果表明:不同耕作方式下,QS35处理LAI、叶绿素相对含量、净光合速率、气孔导度、胞间CO2浓度、蒸腾速率、产量较CK分别提高20.7%,6.4%,17.8%,36.9%,40.1%,18.9%,9.6%,花前和花后Fv/Fm均无显著差异,花前和花后qP、ETR、Y(Ⅱ)在不同光照强度下表现为QS35 > XS35 > CK,NPQ在花后表现为QS35 < XS35 < CK;不同灌溉方式下,QS35SI处理LAI、叶绿素相对含量、净光合速率、气孔导度、胞间CO2浓度、蒸腾速率、产量较CK分别提高23.8%,11.2%,37.9%,69.1%,79.2%,38.7%,7.5%,花前和花后Fv/Fm均无显著差异,花前和花后qP、ETR、Y(Ⅱ)在不同光照强度下表现为QS35SI > QS35DI > QS35 > CK,花前和花后NPQ表现为QS35SI < QS35DI < QS35 < CK。秋深松结合微喷灌能促进玉米光合作用,提高产量。

    Abstract:

    Taking rotary tillage combined with border irrigation as the control (CK), the effects of different tillage methods, including autumn subsoiling (QS35) and summer subsoiling (XS35) under border irrigation, and different irrigation methods, including autumn subsoiling with border irrigation (QS35), autumn subsoiling with microspray irrigation (QS35SI) and autumn subsoiling with drip irrigation (QS35DI), on photosynthetic characteristics of maize were studied to determine the rational irrigation methods under subsoiling. The results showed that the LAI, chlorophyll relative content, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, intercellular CO2 concentration, transpiration rate and yield of QS35 were 20.7%, 6.4%, 17.8%, 36.9%, 40.1%, 18.9%, 9.6% higher than CK under different tillage modes, respectively. There were no significant differences in Fv/Fm before and after anthesis, the qP, ETR, Y(Ⅱ) before and after an thesis were QS35>XS35>CK, while NPQ was QS352 concentration, transpiration rate and yield of QS35 SI treatment were 23.8%, 11.2%, 37.9%, 69.1%, 79.2%, 38.7%, 7.5% higher than CK, respectively. There were no significant differences in Fv/Fm before and after flowering, the qP, ETR, Y(Ⅱ) before and after flowering were QS35 SI > QS35 DI > QS35 > CK, while NPQ was QS35 SI

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘战东, 张凯, 黄超, 孙景生.不同耕作和灌溉方式对玉米光合特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):213~220

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-20
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-08-19
  • 出版日期: